Theory that describes electrons and photons really well, and as Feynman puts it "accounts very precisely for all physical phenomena we have ever observed, except for gravity and nuclear physics" ("including the laughter of the crowd" ;-)).

Learning it is one of Ciro Santilli's main intellectual fetishes.

While Ciro acknowledges that QED is intrinsically challenging due to the wide range or requirements (quantum mechanics, special relativity and electromagnetism), Ciro feels that there is a glaring gap in this moneyless market for a learning material that follows the Middle Way as mentioned at: the missing link between basic and advanced. Richard Feynman Quantum Electrodynamics Lecture at University of Auckland (1979) is one of the best attempts so far, but it falls a bit too close to the superficial side of things, if only Feynman hadn't assumed that the audience doesn't know any mathematics...

The funny thing is that when Ciro Santilli's mother retired, learning it (or as she put it: "how photons and electrons interact") was also one of her retirement plans. She is a pharmacist by training, and doesn't know much mathematics, and her English was somewhat limited. Oh, she also wanted to learn how photosynthesis works (possibly not fully understood by science as that time, 2020). Ambitious old lady!!!

Experiments: quantum electrodynamics experiments.

Combines special relativity with more classical quantum mechanics, but further generalizing the Dirac equation, which also does that: Dirac equation vs quantum electrodynamics. The name "relativistic" likely doesn't need to appear on the title of QED because Maxwell's equations require special relativity, so just having "electro-" in the title is enough.

Before QED, the most advanced theory was that of the Dirac equation, which was already relativistic but TODO what was missing there exactly?

As summarized at: youtube.com/watch?v=_AZdvtf6hPU?t=305 Quantum Field Theory lecture at the African Summer Theory Institute 1 of 4 by Anthony Zee (2004):

- classical mechanics describes large and slow objects
- special relativity describes large and fast objects (they are getting close to the speed of light, so we have to consider relativity)
- classical quantum mechanics describes small and slow objects.
- QED describes objects that are both small and fast

That video also mentions the interesting idea that:Therefore, for small timescales, energy can vary a lot. But mass is equivalent to energy. Therefore, for small time scale, particles can appear and disappear wildly.

- in special relativity, we have the mass-energy equivalence
- in quantum mechanics, thinking along the time-energy uncertainty principle, $ΔE∼Δt1 $

QED is the first quantum field theory fully developed. That framework was later extended to also include the weak interaction and strong interaction. As a result, it is perhaps easier to just Google for "Quantum Field Theory" if you want to learn QED, since QFT is more general and has more resources available generally.

Like in more general quantum field theory, there is on field for each particle type. In quantum field theory, there are only two fields to worry about:

- photon field
- electromagnetism field

- 1955 Nobel Prize in Physics
- 1965 Nobel Prize in Physics
- Andrew Dotson YouTube channel
- Anomalous magnetic dipole moment of the electron
- Color confinement
- Dietterich Labs
- Dirac equation
- Do one cool thing every day
- Electron
- Feynman diagram
- Gauge theory
- Gluon
- Hans Bethe
- Hyperfine structure
- John Archibald Wheeler
- Julian Schwinger
- Lagrangian mechanics
- Lamb-Retherford experiment
- Lamb shift
- Maxwell's equations
- Microwave
- Military-industrial complex
- Millennium Prize Problems
- Particle physics
- Pascual Jordan
- Photon
- Physics
- Quantum chemistry
- Quantum field theory
- Quantum mechanics
- Relativistic quantum mechanics
- Richard Feynman
- Richard Feynman Quantum Electrodynamics Lecture at University of Auckland (1979)
- Solutions of the Schrodinger equation for two electrons
- Space-Time Approach to Quantum Electrodynamic by Richard Feynman (1949)
- Spectral line
- Why you should give money to Ciro Santilli
- Standard Model
- The missing link between basic and advanced
- There is value in tutorials written by early pioneers of the field
- ViaScience
- What does it mean that photons are force carriers for electromagnetism?
- Why do symmetries such as SU(3), SU(2) and U(1) matter in particle physics?