Experiments explained:

- via the Schrödinger equation solution for the hydrogen atom it predicts:
- spectral line basic lines, plus Zeeman effect

- Schrödinger equation solution for the helium atom: perturbative solutions give good approximations to the energy levels
- double-slit experiment: I think we have a closed solution for the max and min probabilities on the measurement wall, and they match experiments

Experiments not explained: those that the Dirac equation explains like:

- fine structure
- spontaneous emission coefficients

To get some intuition on the equation on the consequences of the equation, have a look at:

The easiest to understand case of the equation which you must have in mind initially that of the Schrödinger equation for a free one dimensional particle.

Then, with that in mind, the general form of the Schrödinger equation is:
where:

$iℏ∂t∂ψ(x,t) =H^[ψ(x,t)]$

- $ℏ$ is the reduced Planck constant
- $ψ$ is the wave function
- $t$ is the time
- $H^$ is a linear operator called the Hamiltonian. It takes as input a function $ψ$, and returns another function. This plays a role analogous to the Hamiltonian in classical mechanics: determining it determines what the physical system looks like, and how the system evolves in time, because we can just plug it into the equation and solve it. It basically encodes the total energy and forces of the system.

The $x$ argument of $ψ$ could be anything, e.g.:Note however that there is always a single magical $t$ time variable. This is needed in particular because there is a time partial derivative in the equation, so there must be a corresponding time variable in the function. This makes the equation explicitly non-relativistic.

- we could have preferred polar coordinates instead of linear ones if the potential were symmetric around a point
- we could have more than one particle, e.g. solutions of the Schrodinger equation for two electrons, which would have e.g. $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$ for different particles. No matter how many particles there are, we have just a single $ψ$, we just add more arguments to it.
- we could have even more generalized coordinates. This is much in the spirit of Hamiltonian mechanics or generalized coordinates

The general Schrödinger equation can be broken up into a trivial time-dependent and a time-independent Schrödinger equation by separation of variables. So in practice, all we need to solve is the slightly simpler time-independent Schrödinger equation, and the full equation comes out as a result.

Existence and uniqueness: mathoverflow.net/questions/212913/existence-and-uniqueness-for-two-dimensional-time-dependent-schr%C3%B6dinger-equation

## Tagged

## Ancestors

## Incoming links

- Causality in quantum mechanics
- Conservation of the square amplitude in the Schrodinger equation
- Derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation
- Dirac equation
- Energy operator
- History of quantum mechanics
- Hund's rules
- Important partial differential equation
- Klein-Gordon equation
- Lagrangian mechanics
- Matrix mechanics
- Non-relativistic quantum mechanics
- Particle physics
- Planck constant
- Planck's law
- Plane wave function
- Programmer's model of quantum computers
- Quantization as an Eigenvalue Problem
- Quantum electrodynamics
- Quantum jump
- Quantum mechanical re-interpretation of kinematic and mechanical relations by Heisenberg (1925)
- Quantum mechanics
- Quantum number
- Reduced Planck constant
- Schrödinger equation
- Schrödinger equation for a one dimensional particle
- Separation of variables
- Solving the Schrodinger equation with the time-independent Schrödinger equation
- Spectral line
- Spin
- Spontaneous emission
- System of partial differential equations
- The Schrodinger equation Hamiltonian has to be Hermitian
- Time-independent Schrödinger equation
- Wave function collapse
- Why are complex numbers used in the Schrodinger equation?
- Why does 2s have less energy than 1s if they have the same principal quantum number?
- Zeeman effect