$L^{p}$ norm sequence convergence does not imply pointwise convergence

math.stackexchange.com/questions/138043/does-convergence-in-lp-imply-convergence-almost-everywhere

There are explicit examples of this. We can have ever thinner disturbances to convergence that keep getting less and less area, but never cease to move around.

If it does converge pointwise to something, then it must match of course.

 Ancestors (9)

Fourier basis is complete for $L^{2}$
Riesz-Fischer theorem
Lebesgue integral of $L^{p}$ is complete but Riemann isn't
Lebesgue integral
Integral
Calculus
Area of mathematics
Mathematics
 Home

 Incoming links (1)

Fourier basis is complete for $L^{2}$

Lp norm sequence convergence does not imply pointwise convergence

 Ancestors (9)

 Incoming links (1)

$L^{p}$ norm sequence convergence does not imply pointwise convergence