= Law {wiki} = Legal {synonym} = Illegal {synonym} = Legality {synonym} = Illegality {synonym} = Legally {synonym} = Illegally {synonym} = Legalize {synonym} = Area of law {parent=Law} = Competition law {parent=Area of law} = Antitrust {synonym} = Labour law {parent=Area of law} {wiki} = Four-day workweek {parent=Labour law} {tag=Good} {wiki} We need this. The five day week is designed to suck all the mental life of an average mental worker person, and it leaves basically nothing if they "do their job really well". Advocacy groups: * https://www.4dayweek.com = Property law {parent=Area of law} {wiki} = Trust {disambiguate=Law} {parent=Property law} = Intellectual property {parent=Area of law} {title2=IP} {wiki} = Patent {parent=Intellectual property} {wiki} = Patented {synonym} \Image[https://web.archive.org/web/20230121100526/https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/2d/d5/b5/ecd3eb157a4087/US06293874-20010925-D00000.png] {title=User-operated amusement apparatus for kicking the user's buttocks figure 5} {source=https://patents.google.com/patent/US6293874B1/en} = Crime {parent=Law} {wiki} Some types of crimes include: * {child} \Video[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGo959uECTM] {title= vs Un-Defuseable Bomb by Qxir (2021)} {description=Tells the story of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey%27s_Resort_Hotel_bombing[Harvey's Resort Hotel bombing] (1980)} = Fraud {parent=Crime} {wiki} = Fraudster {parent=Fraud} = Billy Mitchell {c} {disambiguate=gamer} {parent=Fraudster} = Bait-and-switch {parent=Fraud} {wiki} = Clickbait {parent=Bait-and-switch} {wiki} = Clickbaity {synonym} = Organized crime {parent=Crime} {wiki} = Punishment {parent=Crime} {wiki} = Cangue {parent=Punishment} {wiki} = 木枷 {synonym} {title2} = Crucifixion {parent=Punishment} {wiki} = Crucify {synonym} = Crucified {synonym} = Kin punishment {parent=Punishment} {wiki} = Theft {parent=Crime} {wiki} = Freedom of speech {parent=Law} {wiki} For 's campaign for freedom of speech in China: {full}. Ciro has the radical opinion that absolute freedom of speech must be guaranteed by for anyone to talk about absolutely anything, anonymously if they wish, with the exception only of copyright-related infringement. And Ciro believes that there should be no age restriction of access to any information. People should be only be punished for actions that they actually do in the real world. Not even purportedly planning those actions must be punished. Access and ability to publish information must be completely and totally free. If you don't like someone, you should just block them, or start your own campaign to prepare a counter for whatever it is that they are want to do. This freedom does not need to apply to citizens and organizations of other countries, only to citizens of the country in question, since foreign governments can create influence campaigns to affect the rights of your citizens. More info at: https://cirosantilli.com/china-dictatorship/mark-government-controlled-social-media Limiting foreign influence therefore requires some kind of nationality check, which could harm . But Ciro believes that almost certainly such checks can be carried out in anonymous blockchain consensus based mechanisms. Governments would issues nationality tokens, and tokens are used for anonymous confirmations of rights in a way that only the token owner, not even the government, can determine who used the token. E.g. something a bit like what does. Rights could be checked on a once per account basis, or yearly basis, so transaction costs should not be a big issue. Maybe expensive proof-of-work systems can be completely bypassed to the existence of this central token authority? Some people believe that freedom of speech means "freedom of speech that I agree with". Those people should move to or some other . Related: https://cirosantilli.com/china-dictatorship/hate-speech = Censorship {parent=Freedom of speech} {wiki} The opposite of . For [censorship in China] see: https://cirosantilli.com/china-dictatorship/censorship = Law enforcement {parent=Law} {wiki} = Police {parent=Law enforcement} {wiki} = License {parent=Law} {wiki} = Licensed {synonym} Related: * {child} = Copyright {parent=License} {wiki} = Derivative work {parent=Copyright} {wiki} = Fair use {parent=Copyright} {wiki} = Freedom of panorama {parent=License} {wiki} = Free license {parent=License} {wiki} = Freely licensed {synonym} = Open license {parent=Free license} = Creative Commons license {c} {parent=Free license} {wiki} = Creative Commons {c} {synonym} = CC BY {c} {parent=Creative Commons license} = CC BY version {c} {parent=CC BY} = CC BY 4.0 {c} {parent=CC BY version} = CC BY 3.0 {c} {parent=CC BY version} = CC BY-SA {c} {parent=Creative Commons license} This one strikes the right balance between restriction and permissions. NC and ND are simply too restrictive. TODO where does the SA boundary end? E.g.: * : https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/173/what-do-i-need-to-share-if-i-include-cc-by-sa-artwork-in-my-software/11323#11323 *